← Navigation Practice

Building in public without oversharing

What is Building in public without oversharing — and why should I care?

Building in public is the practice of sharing the process of building something — a business, a product, a career, a skill — as it happens, not only after it succeeds. Done well, it creates a narrative that attracts an audience, builds trust, and generates accountability. Done poorly, it becomes oversharing: a stream of updates that feel either curated to the point of dishonesty or raw to the point of inappropriate. The line between useful transparency and damaging disclosure is not obvious, and most people who try building in public cross it in one direction or the other.

How is it really applicable in real life?

This practice applies to any professional who wants to grow an audience by documenting a professional journey in real time — launching a product, pivoting a business, learning a new discipline, or building something new in their field.

How does it actually work?

  1. 1Define what you are building before you start sharing. The narrative only works if there is a clear destination — a product launching, a skill being developed, a business being built. Vague journeys do not sustain audiences.
  2. 2Establish the sharing boundary before publishing anything. Some things should stay private: client names without consent, financial details with counterparties who did not agree to disclosure, internal team conflicts. Decide the boundary before it comes up, not during a crisis.
  3. 3Share the process, not just the milestone. The decisions you made, the reasoning behind them, the alternatives you considered and why you rejected them — this is the content that creates genuine value for your audience.
  4. 4Be honest about difficulty without being a protagonist in a drama. 'This was harder than I expected, here is what I learned' is useful. Performative struggle for engagement is not, and audiences notice the difference.
  5. 5Never share things that would harm a real person or organization — even if framed as 'what I learned.' Transparency that damages others is not a virtue.
  6. 6Think of every public update as a permanent document. If the product fails, if the pivot reverses, if the opinion changes — those posts remain. Only share things you would be comfortable explaining in two years.
  7. 7Measure whether it is working by signals that matter: are the right people following, engaging, or reaching out? Not vanity metrics. If the audience being built does not match the audience you need, adjust the content, not the audience.

Visual diagram coming soon.

Show me a real example

A product designer begins sharing their process of transitioning from agency work to an independent practice. They post weekly: the clients they pitched, the ones who said no and why, the pricing decisions they struggled with, the first contract they won. They share their reasoning, not just their outcomes. Over nine months they attract 6,000 followers — most of them designers in similar transitions who want the playbook, not just the highlight reel. When they eventually launch a course on building an independent practice, 80 people pre-purchase it before it exists. The transparency was the marketing.

What do I walk away with?

Building in public works when it is genuinely useful to the audience watching — not when it is a performance of vulnerability or a personal diary. Share the reasoning, protect the people, and think in years, not posts.